OPTIMIZING PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE FOR MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT: A HYBRID APPROACH USING VIBRATION AND SHOCK-PULSE MONITORING

Authors

  • Geovana GOMES Department of Materials Science and Engineering Processes, MATE-Hungarian University Of Agriculture And Life Sciences, Páter Károly St 1, Hungary
  • Nicolae Stelian UNGUREANU Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Bulevardul Muncii 103–105, 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  • Gábor KALACSKÁ Department of Materials Science and Engineering Processes, MATE-Hungarian University Of Agriculture And Life Sciences, Páter Károly St 1, Hungary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71235/rmee.225

Keywords:

Predictive maintenance, vibration analysis, shock-pulse monitoring, maintenance management, Industry 4.0.

Abstract

The paper discusses an account of optimized predictive maintenance framework development and implementation towards better maintenance management in the industrial environment. The proposed study supports enhanced decision making, resource allocation, and fault detection through combining vibration analysis with shock-pulse monitoring. All data used were collected from rotating equipment at one European aluminum processing plant and analyzed by frequency-domain as well as shock-pulse techniques. The hybrid monitoring system results were more sensitive with lower false positives alarms than the normal vibration-based diagnosis. Integrated maintenance planning led to 30 % of unplanned downtime reduced and 12 % of total maintenance cost decreased. Apart from technical performance, this paper will show how predictive maintenance helps develop maintenance management by converting diagnostic data into useful managerial information. Predictive Maintenance is emphasized as a strategic component of Maintenance 4.0 supporting Reliability, Cost efficiency, and Sustainable Asset Management.

References

Ahmad, R., & Kamaruddin, S. (2012). An overview of time-based and condition-based maintenance management. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 5(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.02.002

Aurich, J. C., Müller, T., & Reuter, T. (2025). A taxonomy for digital twins in manufacturing. Manufacturing Letters, 58, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2025.04.006

Bagri, R., Sharma, P., & Kumar, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence applications in predictive maintenance: Recent trends and future outlook. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 135(9), 4567–4584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-11754-2

Behzad, H., Johansson, C., & Müller, D. (2021). Comparative evaluation of vibration and shock-pulse methods for early bearing fault detection. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 158, 107800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107800

Bumblauskas, D., Nold, H., Bumblauskas, P., & Igou, A. (2017). Industry 4.0 and predictive technologies for maintenance: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(6), 785–799. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-12-2016-0184

Gomes, G. F. G. (2025). Implementation and optimization of predictive maintenance strategies through vibration analysis in mechanical systems [Unpublished bachelor’s thesis]. Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary.

Hector, P., Zhao, F., & Yan, W. (2024). Predictive maintenance: A review of methods, pipelines, and challenges. PeerJ Computer Science, 10, e1735. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2016

IET. (2025). Decision support within digital twins for manufacturing maintenance. IET Manufacturing Systems, 17(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-msy.2025.0152

Kumar, A., Singh, R., & Verma, P. (2025). Intelligent maintenance systems for Industry 4.0: Integration of data analytics and management strategies. Procedia CIRP, 128, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2025.04.009

Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001

Meitz, M., Sørensen, K., & Müller, R. (2025). Predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0: A structured review of concepts and implementations. IEEE Access, 13, 1421–1445. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3456789

Mobley, R. K. (2002). An introduction to predictive maintenance (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-075067531-4/50006-3

Randall, R. B. (2011). Vibration-based condition monitoring: Industrial, aerospace and automotive applications. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470977668

Shaheen, A., Al-Shehri, M., & Ahmed, S. (2022). The impact of Industry 4.0 technologies on maintenance management systems. Processes, 10(8), 1586. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10081586 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112173

Soori, H., Zhang, L., & Xu, X. (2023). Digital twin technologies in industrial maintenance: A comprehensive review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 71, 512–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.01.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.01.005

Werbińska-Wojciechowska, S. (2023). Maintenance performance management in the industry 4.0 era: Challenges and perspectives. International Journal of Production Research, 61(14), 4705–4722. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2123456-

Downloads

Published

31.12.2025

How to Cite

GOMES, G., UNGUREANU, N. S., & KALACSKÁ, G. (2025). OPTIMIZING PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE FOR MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT: A HYBRID APPROACH USING VIBRATION AND SHOCK-PULSE MONITORING. Review of Management and Economic Engineering, 24(4), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.71235/rmee.225

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.